How changing can be one?
Because we talk about this changing and not another...
According to Badiou, t is because the one is not that the void is unique ... which is equivalent to saying that its mark is a proper name". This is how Badiou interprets the axiom of the null (or void) set and distills the question of the One and Many from Being and change.
The question is not simply "how does one think non-being?" but also (and Parmenides also recognized this) "how does one name non-being?" The proper name, as Badiou points out, is not the transcendent God or the promise of the One or presence but the "un-presentation and the un-being of the one".
Download ebooks on http://www.frenchtheory.com/
See that post with different algorithms in metabole
See the journal French Metablog with today different posts
Enter Hypertextual as a member
No comments:
Post a Comment