We must intentionally avoided explicitly outlining the manner in which
an hyperdocument is written--it's a kind of a puzzle or tapestry which can be put together on several levels, for example
what I'm saying and why I'm saying it this way. The work is different every time it's read, and I suppose the meaning varies. In some ways this kind of document seems unfathomable, maybe because of
how we've been trained to read, and trained to think.