Hypertextual as a circle

Hypertextual exhibits the appearance of a circle which closes with itself, and has no beginning in the same way as the other systems have.

To speak of a beginning of hypertextual has a meaning only in relation to a blogger who proposes to commence the reading (Metablog), and not in relation to the hypertext as hypertext. The same thing may be thus expressed with philosophy. The notion of philosophy — the notion therefore with which we start — which, for the very reason that it is initial, implies a separation between the thought which is our object, and the subject philosophising which is, as it were, external to the former, must be grasped and comprehended by the hypertext itself.

This is in short, the one single aim, action, and goal of hypertextual — to arrive at the notion of its notion, and thus secure its return and its satisfaction.

Download ebooks on http://www.frenchtheory.com/
See that post with different algorithms in metabole
See the journal French Metablog with today different posts

Theory of meaning and circularity

Intention-based semantic theories are still popular and are actively pursued.

But they have not entirely succeeded in reducing meaning and psychology to actions and utterances. If meaning is defined as acting so as to induce belief and action in another, theories of meaning must be grounded in non-semantic terms to avoid circularity. And there is some doubt whether this can be done. Individuals act according to beliefs, and the communication of these beliefs eventually and necessarily calls on public beliefs and language.

Download ebooks on http://www.frenchtheory.com/

See that post with different algorithms in metabole

See the journal French Metablog with today different posts