Why all these posts about Heidegger and his concept of Ereignis?
Everyone knows that Heidegger criticizes austerely the world of the technique. And hypertext belongs especially to this world...
Nevertheless, this question is related to another: how the solicitation of hypertext as a general bringing-forth might be regarded simultaneously as a function of poiesis and of technics?
In other words, how this solicitation as a function of poesis and of technics, both "originary" and mechanical production, reproduction or repetition, would describe what Joyce terms a "paradox lust," operating somewhere between the concepts of techne and logos.
Similarly, in light of the various recent developments in the application of computing science within the field of poetic scholarship, the question arises as to what it might imply if we were to approach hypertext as a particular technology, as technological - what the word "technology" might signify in the context of Joyce's writing practice - keeping in mind Heidegger's assertion that "techne belongs to bringing-forth, to poiesis; it is something poetic."
